weiter:
Washington's road to Iran goes through Syria (Op-Ed)
[RT] The results of the Geneva talks on Syria depend on whom you ask.
US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton insists that the principle of “mutual consent” on which a “transitional government” in Syria would be based, means President Assad has to go. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, on the contrary, insists the formation of a “transitional government” will be made on inclusive basis.
Before discussing what it means, let’s stop for a second to grasp the sheer fact: five foreign powers gathered to decide the fate of a country, in the absence of its leader and its people, who never asked them to do anything of the kind, let alone gave any mandate. This is an outrageous breach of international law. And what is even more outrageous is that nobody is concerned or even talking about it.weiter:
Verwandte Beiträge:
- Iran-Sanktionen treiben Ölpreis an / China lehnt einseitige Sanktion gegen Dritte ab
- Kissinger: Moment of truth on Iran within months
- SWP Studie: Die USA, Israel und die Legitimität eines Präventivangriffs gegen Iran [PDF]
- Blasts from the Past: Western Support for Iran's Nuclear program [2006]
- Iran feiert, seit 20 Jahren kurz vor Fertigstellung von Atombombe zu stehen
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen